© 2004 Lang Baker
Thornton v StateSeptember 22, 2004No. 0080-03 Concurring opinion by Judge Womack Links to other opinions in this case: Majority opinion by Judge Hervey Concurring opinion by Judge Price
The court of appeals held that the appellant's Fourth Amendment objections were properly overruled because no evidence that was obtained from the illegal seizure in Arizona was admitted in his trial in Texas. See Thornton v. State, No. 2-01-152-CR (Tex. Ct App. -- Fort Worth Dec. 12, 2002) (unpublished). I agree, and on that basis I concur in the judgment of the Court. En banc. Filed: September 22, 2004. Publish. This information is made available as a free public service for your personal, non-commercial use. While every effort has been made to provide accurate material at this site, it is provided "as is" and no representations are made that it is free of mistakes or inaccuracies. This file was derived from the text posted on the web site of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, by the automatic operation of conversion software, and may contain errors.
Baker's Legal Pages are a public service of Freelance Enterprises, Inc.
© 2004 Lang Baker |